IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP> "Discussions" (read arg

IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP> "Discussions" (read arg

Re: IPP> "Discussions" (read arguments) over e-mail

From: harryl@us.ibm.com
Date: Fri Jun 23 2000 - 13:31:27 EDT

  • Next message: don@lexmark.com: "Re: IPP> "Discussions" (read arguments) over e-mail"

    If you think e-mail DISCUSSION is disruptive, just imaging getting print
    job notifications in your e-mail too!

    Harry Lewis
    IBM Printing Systems

    Sent by: owner-ipp@pwg.org
    06/23/2000 10:34 AM

            To: ipp@pwg.org
            Subject: IPP> "Discussions" (read arguments) over e-mail

    I find this method of working an issue to be terrible. E-mail is terribly
    disruptive and hard to follow. By the time the next post comes in, I've
    forgotten the next set of points to be made.

    Ever heard of lawyers arguing a case before a Judge over e-mail. I rest
    case!! :>)
    (geez... I can't believe I made my point by using a lawyer as a GOOD

    * Don Wright don@lexmark.com *
    * Chair, Printer Working Group *
    * Chair, IEEE MSC *
    * *
    * Director, Strategic & Technical Alliances *
    * Lexmark International *
    * 740 New Circle Rd *
    * Lexington, Ky 40550 *
    * 859-232-4808 (phone) 859-232-6740 (fax) *
    * (Former area code until 10/1 was 606) *

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 23 2000 - 13:41:27 EDT