IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP>NOT mailto feature from IETF meeti

Re: IPP>NOT mailto feature from IETF meeting (RE: IPP> ADM -TheIPPNotification I-Ds will now go the IESG)]

From: Jay Martin (jkm@underscore.com)
Date: Fri Aug 18 2000 - 14:17:43 EDT

Next message: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org: "IPP> I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipp-ops-admin-req-00.txt"

Previous message: ned.freed@innosoft.com: "Re: IPP>NOT mailto feature from IETF meeting (RE: IPP> ADM - TheIPPNotification I-Ds will now go the IESG)]"
In reply to: ned.freed@innosoft.com: "Re: IPP>NOT mailto feature from IETF meeting (RE: IPP> ADM - TheIPPNotification I-Ds will now go the IESG)]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Ned,

> Then, when NOTARY, with its structured report format came out...

Can you give us a very brief summary of what NOTARY is, and perhaps
a pointer or two to some online info?

...jay

Next message: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org: "IPP> I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipp-ops-admin-req-00.txt"
Previous message: ned.freed@innosoft.com: "Re: IPP>NOT mailto feature from IETF meeting (RE: IPP> ADM - TheIPPNotification I-Ds will now go the IESG)]"
In reply to: ned.freed@innosoft.com: "Re: IPP>NOT mailto feature from IETF meeting (RE: IPP> ADM - TheIPPNotification I-Ds will now go the IESG)]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Aug 18 2000 - 14:29:48 EDT