IPP Mail Archive: RE: IPP>NOT mailto feature from IETF meeti

RE: IPP>NOT mailto feature from IETF meeting (RE: IPP> ADM - The IPPNotification I-Ds will now go the IESG)]

From: McDonald, Ira (imcdonald@sharplabs.com)
Date: Wed Aug 23 2000 - 10:58:08 EDT

  • Next message: McDonald, Ira: "RE: IPP> machine readable etc. - why Harry is right"

    Hi Bob,

    So I checked again (as I did yesterday). Bottom of page 16
    for message body content says MUST for a list of localized
    content.

    That has to be fixed.

    Cheers,
    - Ira

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Herriot, Robert [mailto:Robert.Herriot@pahv.xerox.com]
    Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2000 1:48 PM
    To: McDonald, Ira; Herriot, Robert; 'jkm@underscore.com'
    Cc: 'ned.freed@innosoft.com'; ipp@pwg.org
    Subject: RE: IPP>NOT mailto feature from IETF meeting (RE: IPP> ADM -
    The IPPNotification I-Ds will now go the IESG)]

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: McDonald, Ira [mailto:imcdonald@sharplabs.com]
    > Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2000 1:24 PM
    > To meet your (and other PWG members) desires, simply
    > delete all language about the content OR change it
    > be SHOULD (RECOMMENDED) and punt on testing.

    The language in the spec has said "SHOULD" all along.

    We have tried to recommend content in a general way and leave the specific
    phrasing to the vendor. For example, we recommend that a printer name be
    present, but let the vendor choose the words.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 23 2000 - 11:17:48 EDT