IPP Mail Archive: RE: IPP>NOT mailto feature from IETF meeti

IPP Mail Archive: RE: IPP>NOT mailto feature from IETF meeti

RE: IPP>NOT mailto feature from IETF meeting (RE: IPP> ADM - The IPPNotification I-Ds will now go the IESG)]

From: Herriot, Robert (Robert.Herriot@pahv.xerox.com)
Date: Wed Aug 23 2000 - 17:44:01 EDT

  • Next message: Herriot, Robert: "RE: IPP> machine readable etc. - why Harry is right"

    Please give me more context, such as document version and line number.

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: McDonald, Ira [mailto:imcdonald@sharplabs.com]
    > Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2000 7:58 AM
    > To: 'Herriot, Robert'; McDonald, Ira; 'jkm@underscore.com'
    > Cc: 'ned.freed@innosoft.com'; ipp@pwg.org
    > Subject: RE: IPP>NOT mailto feature from IETF meeting (RE: IPP> ADM -
    > The IPPNotification I-Ds will now go the IESG)]
    >
    >
    > Hi Bob,
    >
    > So I checked again (as I did yesterday). Bottom of page 16
    > for message body content says MUST for a list of localized
    > content.
    >
    > That has to be fixed.
    >
    > Cheers,
    > - Ira
    >
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Herriot, Robert [mailto:Robert.Herriot@pahv.xerox.com]
    > Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2000 1:48 PM
    > To: McDonald, Ira; Herriot, Robert; 'jkm@underscore.com'
    > Cc: 'ned.freed@innosoft.com'; ipp@pwg.org
    > Subject: RE: IPP>NOT mailto feature from IETF meeting (RE: IPP> ADM -
    > The IPPNotification I-Ds will now go the IESG)]
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > > -----Original Message-----
    > > From: McDonald, Ira [mailto:imcdonald@sharplabs.com]
    > > Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2000 1:24 PM
    > > To meet your (and other PWG members) desires, simply
    > > delete all language about the content OR change it
    > > be SHOULD (RECOMMENDED) and punt on testing.
    >
    > The language in the spec has said "SHOULD" all along.
    >
    > We have tried to recommend content in a general way and leave
    > the specific
    > phrasing to the vendor. For example, we recommend that a
    > printer name be
    > present, but let the vendor choose the words.
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Aug 23 2000 - 17:53:07 EDT