IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP> NOT> "notify-status-code&

Re: IPP> NOT> "notify-status-code" is undefined

From: Michael Sweet (mike@easysw.com)
Date: Tue Oct 17 2000 - 09:04:38 EDT

Next message: frank65_8@norcol.ac.uk: "IPP> Hi, this is for you....."

Previous message: Hugo Parra: "Re: IPP> NOT> "notify-status-code" is undefined"
In reply to: Hugo Parra: "Re: IPP> NOT> "notify-status-code" is undefined"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hugo Parra wrote:
>
> Their value range would suggest that "notify-status-code"s are in
> the same space as the other regular IPP "status-codes". For that
> reason I'd suggest that they be encoded the same way as
> "status-codes" i.e., with two bytes. I'm currently using ENUM to
> encode them. What do others think?

I agree with Carl's comment - there isn't an attribute tag for a
16-bit integer value, so you have to stick with the existing tags
(enum or integer, both are 32 bits.)

-- 
______________________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Easy Software Products                  mike@easysw.com
Printing Software for UNIX                       http://www.easysw.com

Next message: frank65_8@norcol.ac.uk: "IPP> Hi, this is for you....."
Previous message: Hugo Parra: "Re: IPP> NOT> "notify-status-code" is undefined"
In reply to: Hugo Parra: "Re: IPP> NOT> "notify-status-code" is undefined"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 17 2000 - 09:19:01 EDT