IPP Mail Archive: RE: IPP> NOT> "notify-status-code&

RE: IPP> NOT> "notify-status-code" is undefined

From: Herriot, Robert (Robert.Herriot@pahv.xerox.com)
Date: Wed Oct 25 2000 - 20:24:40 EDT

  • Next message: Zehler, Peter: "IPP> Bake Off 3 issue 1"

    Yes, you are correct. I asked Tom to fix the statement.

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Carl Kugler/Boulder/IBM [mailto:kugler@us.ibm.com]
    > Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2000 11:09 AM
    > To: Hastings, Tom N
    > Cc: ipp@pwg.org
    > Subject: RE: IPP> NOT> "notify-status-code" is undefined
    >
    >
    >
    > Tom-
    >
    > Regarding this suggested text:
    >
    > >"notify-status-code" (type2 enum):
    > >Indicates the status of this subscription (see section 17
    > for the status
    > >code definitions). This attribute MUST be returned in each
    > Subscription
    > >Attributes Group.
    >
    > I don't understand why you say this attribute MUST be returned in each
    > Subscription Attributes Group. Notify-status-code is returned
    > only if there
    > were problems processing the subscription, right?
    > Subscription Attributes
    > Groups with a "notify-status-code" attribute are ones that failed.
    >
    > -Carl
    >
    >
    >
    > "Hastings, Tom N" <hastings@cp10.es.xerox.com> on 10/20/2000
    > 07:51:59 PM
    >
    > To: Carl Kugler/Boulder/IBM@IBMUS
    > cc: ipp@pwg.org
    > Subject: RE: IPP> NOT> "notify-status-code" is undefined
    >
    >
    >
    > At the Bake Off 3 we have discussed the following resolution.
    > Please send
    > comments.
    >
    > Thanks,
    > Tom
    >
    > Problem: [ipp-ntfy] doesn't specify the attribute syntax for the
    > "notify-status-code" that is returned in each Subscription
    > Attributes group
    > in a Subscription Creation response.
    >
    > Suggested solution: [ipp-indp] defines the attribute syntax for the
    > "notification-status-code" (which should be spelled
    > "notify-status-code")
    > attribute returned in each Notification Attributes group as
    > 'type2 enum'.
    > [ipp-mod] defines the attribute syntax of the "status-code"
    > parameter as
    > 'type2 enum'. The 'type2 enum' attribute syntax, rather than
    > 'integer' is
    > intended to be used when the specification defines specific
    > meanings for
    > each value. Therefore, [ipp-ntfy] should define the
    > "notify-status-code"
    > to
    > have the 'type2 enum' attribute syntax. Change name in
    > [ipp-indp] from
    > "notification-status-code" to "notify-status-code" for consistency of
    > attribute names.
    >
    > Suggested text:
    > Add to [ipp-ntfy] section 11.1.1.2 Create-Job Response:
    > "notify-status-code" (type2 enum):
    > Indicates the status of this subscription (see section 17 for
    > the status
    > code definitions). This attribute MUST be returned in each
    > Subscription
    > Attributes Group.
    >
    > Change [ipp-indp] section 8.1.2 Send-Notifications Response from
    > "notification-status-code" to "notify-status-code".
    >
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Carl Kugler/Boulder/IBM [mailto:kugler@us.ibm.com]
    > Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 14:57
    > To: ipp@pwg.org
    > Subject: IPP> NOT> "notify-status-code" is undefined
    >
    >
    > ipp-not-spec-000830 fails to specify the attribute syntax for
    > "notify-status-code" (returned in the Subscription Attributes
    > Groups of
    > responses).
    >
    > It's not really obvious how to encode it, either. The
    > operation attribute
    > group's "status-code" is a SIGNED-SHORT in a special
    > location. There is no
    > attribute tag for a SIGNED-SHORT. "Integer" and "enum" are
    > SIGNED-INTEGER.
    >
    > I'm guessing it should be (integer(0x00000001:0x00000415))?
    >
    > -Carl
    >
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 25 2000 - 20:35:50 EDT