Harry,
This doesn't really commit us either way, but it does
lower the expectation. I don't see any problem.
Ron
In a message dated Wed, 18 Apr 2001 5:03:49 PM Eastern Daylight Time, "Harry Lewis" <harryl@us.ibm.com> writes:
<< Why conjecture about what we will or won't attempt to do in the future?
Why say anything?
----------------------------------------------
Harry Lewis
IBM Printing Systems
----------------------------------------------
RonBergman@aol.com
Sent by: owner-ipp@pwg.org
04/17/2001 08:17 PM
To: <hastings@cp10.es.xerox.com>
cc: <ipp@pwg.org>
Subject: RE: IPP> Appendix to Reference Existing Usage
Tom,
Good suggestion! I am going to reword slightly.
"...this document; existing references will suffice."
Too many "standards" in the original!
Ron
In a message dated Tue, 17 Apr 2001 9:56:04 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
"Hastings, Tom N" <hastings@cp10.es.xerox.com> writes:
<< Ron,
We might also add a sentence to indicate that we don't intend to keep
updating this Appendix when additional standards are published that could
use our names and/or reference our Media standard, such as UPnP. How
about
adding the following to the end of the first paragraph:
No attempt will be made to update this appendix when additional standards
reference this standard; such references to this standard will suffice.
Tom
-----Original Message-----
From: RonBergman@aol.com [mailto:RonBergman@aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 09:24
To: ipp@pwg.org
Subject: IPP> Appendix to Reference Exisitng Usage
Here is my proposal for a reference appendix that defines the usage of
media
names in existing standards. This is a compact version of the recent
proposal from Tom Hastings.
I intend to include this appendix in the next version of the Media Names
specification.
Ron Bergman
Hitachi Koki Imaging Solutions
>>
>>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 18 2001 - 19:10:34 EDT