IPP Mail Archive: RE: IPP> Proposed deletions and additions

RE: IPP> Proposed deletions and additions to Media Types for Medi a Std

From: Bergman, Ron (Ron.Bergman@Hitachi-hkis.com)
Date: Fri May 18 2001 - 11:01:37 EDT

  • Next message: Hastings, Tom N: "RE: IPP> RE: Revised ABNF per Monday's Phone Conference [parsers SHOULD handle new classes]"

    Tom,

    I agree with Michael's position on this. I don't believe there is
    any advantage in defining single or two sided.

            Ron

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Michael Sweet [mailto:mike@easysw.com]
    Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 7:14 AM
    To: Hastings, Tom N
    Cc: ipp@pwg.org; IMAGING@forum.upnp.org; GRANT,MELINDA
    (HP-Vancouver,ex1); Mark VanderWiele (E-mail)
    Subject: Re: IPP> Proposed deletions and additions to Media Types for
    Media Std

    "Hastings, Tom N" wrote:
    >
    > But leave in the two-sided for the stationery-coated, stationery-
    > glossy, and stationery-matte, correct?

    For the purposes of defining the media type, it's probably best to
    keep both photo and stationary media ambigious (e.g. "may or may not
    be coated on both sides") than to say something specific. These are
    already generalized names anyways, and in actual use (media-col, etc.)
    we have the means of identifying more specific requirements. 

    -- 
______________________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Easy Software Products                  mike@easysw.com
Printing Software for UNIX                       http://www.easysw.com

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 18 2001 - 10:59:29 EDT