"McDonald, Ira" wrote:
> Hi folks,
> This thread has been going for several weeks on the SLP mailing
> list. Could IPP implementors who plan to support SLP (at some
> point) please participate (here on the IPP list and _then_ on
> the SLP list)?
> This is the same phantom issue that wasted three months in late
> 1999 on the SLP and IPP lists. The PWG concensus at that time
> was _one_ registration for _one_ print device.
FWIW, the current SLP integration with CUPS (hopefully to be released
in the next patch update, e.g. 1.1.10) provides one registration for
each local print queue on the system, e.g.:
We don't try to enumerate all of the possible addresses (e.g. from
multiple interfaces), although that might be added in a future
-- ______________________________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Easy Software Products email@example.com Printing Software for UNIX http://www.easysw.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 16 2001 - 09:16:10 EDT