Patrik and Ned,
I wasn't aware of some of these failings of our DL until the problems now
I can assure you that I am addressing this problem with highest priority!
10701 S Eastern Ave #1117
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patrik Fältström [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 9:58 AM
> To: McDonald, Ira; McDonald, Ira; 'firstname.lastname@example.org'
> Cc: email@example.com; 'Carl'
> Subject: RE: Urgent - Ned not subscribed to IPP list
> --On 2002-04-10 09.50 -0700 "McDonald, Ira"
> <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > All of the mailing lists hosted by the PWG server were with _many_
> > announcements after a long warning period closed to all non-subscriber
> > postings last year, due to extremely high levels of spam (greater
> > the valid postings to the lists). All subscribers were warned and the
> > PWG site said as much on the Web pages.
> > Whether the host of the PWG server (Lexmark) can provide software to
> > send non-subscriber postings to a moderator and whether a moderator
> > volunteer can be found for the IPP list remains to be seen...
> Once again. I hope the message is very clear from Ned and myself.
> You fix this ASAP, or you move the mailing lists.
> Having the policy you describe (are you sure you have not misunderstood
> something?) is not an acceptable policy.
> Once again:
> See http://www.ietf.org/IESG/STATEMENTS/mail-submit-policy.txt
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 10 2002 - 13:47:20 EDT