IPP Mail Archive: IPP> FW: BOUNCE ipp@pwg.org: Non-member

IPP> FW: BOUNCE ipp@pwg.org: Non-member submission from [ned.freed@mrochek.com]

From: Carl (carl@manros.com)
Date: Tue Jun 11 2002 - 00:48:17 EDT

  • Next message: McDonald, Ira: "RE: IPP> Storing capabilities as single text string"

    Fowarded message from Ned Freed

    Carl-Uno Manros
    10701 S Eastern Ave #1117
    Henderson, NV 89052, USA
    Tel +1-702-617-9414
    Fax +1-702-617-9417
    Mob +1-310-251-7103
    Email carl@manros.com

    -----Original Message-----
    From: owner-ipp@pwg.org [mailto:owner-ipp@pwg.org]
    Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 8:09 PM
    To: ipp-approval@pwg.org
    Subject: BOUNCE ipp@pwg.org: Non-member submission from
    [ned.freed@mrochek.com]

    Subject: Re: IPP> Storing capabilities as single text string
    In-reply-to: "Your message dated Mon, 10 Jun 2002 17:25:10 -0700"
     <116DB56CD7DED511BC7800508B2CA5370A1A2B@mailsrvnt02.enet.sharplabs.com>
    To: "McDonald, Ira" <imcdonald@sharplabs.com>
    Cc: "'ifx@pwg.org'" <ifx@pwg.org>, "'ipp@pwg.org'" <ipp@pwg.org>
    Message-id: <01KIS0R8DAEQ00019Q@mauve.mrochek.com>
    MIME-version: 1.0
    Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    References:
     <116DB56CD7DED511BC7800508B2CA5370A1A2B@mailsrvnt02.enet.sharplabs.com>

    > Hi folks,

    > Below is an excerpt from Ned Freed (IETF Applications Area Director)
    > comments on ESMTP extensions for CONNEG from the IETF Internet FAX WG
    > <draft-ietf-fax-esmtp-conneg-01.txt>:

    > "...Although several examples of returned capabilities are shown, the
    document
    > isn't very specific about how capabilities have to be formatted. In
    particular,
    > I'd expect to see capabilities often stored as a single string without any
    line
    > breaks. Some advice on how to take such a string and format it for
    inclusion in
    > the reponse seems warranted."

    > Note Ned's preference fill a flat string without newline characters.

    Er, that wasn't my preference. I simply note that content capabilities
    can and will be stored as a long string without any line breaks.

    > Advice
    > worth considering (although the IPP string length of 1024 would be
    > problematic
    > here...).

    And since protocol limits may be incompatible with what's stored some
    formatting may be necessary to return what's stored in a legitimate way.
    The document needs to talk about how this is done or it is likely not to
    be done correctly.

                                    Ned



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jun 11 2002 - 00:48:57 EDT