IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP> 2 more significant proposed incre

IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP> 2 more significant proposed incre

Re: IPP> 2 more significant proposed increases in conformance requirements for the IPP Document object spec

From: Mike Sweet (mike@easysw.com)
Date: Sat Apr 19 2003 - 22:54:17 EDT

  • Next message: Mike Sweet: "Re: [SPAM] RE: IPP> 4 significant proposed increases in conformance requirem ents for the IPP Document object spec"

    Hastings, Tom N wrote:
    > ...
    > 2. Add a REQUIRED way to the Get-Jobs operation for the client to get the
    > Jobs following the limit requested in a previous request.
    >
    > So add the "start-after-job-id" (integer (0:MAX)) Operation attribute.

    This is a nice addition, but has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH
    DOCUMENT OBJECTS. It doesn't belong here. If anything, you should
    put together a single, small spec that adds this functionality to
    Get-Jobs separately. A pain, but this single attribute is useful
    on its own.

    Also, you probably need to have a way to let the client know that
    this attribute is supported, e.g.
    "start-after-job-id-supported (boolean)"...

    -- 
    ______________________________________________________________________
    Michael Sweet, Easy Software Products                  mike@easysw.com
    Printing Software for UNIX                       http://www.easysw.com
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Apr 19 2003 - 23:02:38 EDT