IPP Mail Archive: Re: SM> Re: IPP> 4 significant proposed

IPP Mail Archive: Re: SM> Re: IPP> 4 significant proposed

Re: SM> Re: IPP> 4 significant proposed increases in conformance requirements for the IPP Document object spec

From: Mike Sweet (mike@easysw.com)
Date: Sat Apr 19 2003 - 23:14:06 EDT

  • Next message: McDonald, Ira: "RE: [SPAM] RE: IPP> 4 significant proposed increases in conforman ce requirem ents for the IPP Document object spec"

    McDonald, Ira wrote:
    > ...
    > 2) I agree that PDL override is hard to implement (in _some_ PDLs), but
    > what Tom and I have proposed is to disambiguate _which_ attributes
    > (if any) can be guaranteed to successfully override the PDL. Seems
    > to me like a good clarity enhancement to IPP.

    PDL override is not even well-defined; what do you do with a PDF file
    that was formatted for a different media size? Scale it? Center it?
    Crop it? What constitutes an override???

    -- 
    ______________________________________________________________________
    Michael Sweet, Easy Software Products                  mike@easysw.com
    Printing Software for UNIX                       http://www.easysw.com
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Apr 19 2003 - 23:22:30 EDT