IPP Mail Archive: Re: SM> Re: IPP> 4 significant proposed

IPP Mail Archive: Re: SM> Re: IPP> 4 significant proposed

Re: SM> Re: IPP> 4 significant proposed increases in conformance requirements for the IPP Document object spec

From: Mike Sweet (mike@easysw.com)
Date: Mon Apr 21 2003 - 16:44:36 EDT

  • Next message: Mike Sweet: "Re: IPP> 2 more significant proposed increases in conformance requirements for the IPP Document object spec"

    McDonald, Ira wrote:
    > Hi Michael,
    >
    > Actually scaling, centering, and cropping are all addressed
    > for IPPFAX (extensions that will certainly migrate to general
    > IPP/1.1 implementations).
    > ...

    Well, they *might* migrate to general implementations, however it
    would *certainly* be appropriate to provide a reference in the
    spec and to summarize the general policies that should be used
    and what is actually meant by PDL override. In other words, there
    is currently no definition in an IPP document of what PDL overrides
    actually cover, i.e. what changes to the presentation of a document
    constitutes an override?

    -- 
    ______________________________________________________________________
    Michael Sweet, Easy Software Products                  mike@easysw.com
    Printing Software for UNIX                       http://www.easysw.com
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 21 2003 - 16:45:55 EDT