IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP> 1 more significant proposed confo

IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP> 1 more significant proposed confo

Re: IPP> 1 more significant proposed conformance change to the IPP Documen t object spec

From: Mike Sweet (mike@easysw.com)
Date: Mon Apr 21 2003 - 17:14:17 EDT

  • Next message: Dennis Carney: "Re: IPP> 2 more significant proposed increases in conformance requirements for the IPP Document object spec"

    Hastings, Tom N wrote:
    > ...
    > 1. DEPRECATE the way a client can close a Job by supplying an empty

    Hmm, knowing that people are busy, etc., what are the chances that
    we do an IPP/1.2 specification based upon the current 1.1 docs +
    the common extensions (collections, notifications?, job-and-printer
    ops, plus the document object stuff)?

    This is another extension which is pointing to an IPP/1.2 version
    bump - deprecating operations is something that should be reserved
    for new versions, since otherwise you might not have at least 1
    version to provide a transition period...

    -- 
    ______________________________________________________________________
    Michael Sweet, Easy Software Products                  mike@easysw.com
    Printing Software for UNIX                       http://www.easysw.com
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 21 2003 - 17:15:10 EDT