IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP> RFC: Add required document-format values for IPP v2?

Re: IPP> RFC: Add required document-format values for IPP v2?

From: Dave Whitehead (david@lexmark.com)
Date: Thu Jul 31 2008 - 14:22:20 EDT

  • Next message: Ira McDonald: "Re: IPP> RFC: Add required document-format values for IPP v2?"

    If we can agree to the correct document format, prototyping could be a
    matter of minutes.

    dhw

                                                                               
                 Michael R Sweet
                 <msweet@apple.com
    > To
                                           Dave Whitehead <david@lexmark.com>
                 07/31/2008 02:02 cc
                 PM Ira McDonald
                                           <blueroofmusic@gmail.com>,
                                           ipp@pwg.org, "Farrell, Lee"
                                           <Lee.Farrell@cda.canon.com>,
                                           owner-ipp@pwg.org,
                                           ptykodi@tykodi.com
                                                                       Subject
                                           Re: IPP> RFC: Add required
                                           document-format values for IPP v2?
                                                                               
                                                                               
                                                                               
                                                                               
                                                                               
                                                                               

    Dave Whitehead wrote:
    > I think option 1 may be the way to proceed (if that's what we want to
    do!)
    > since it would then be just another document we reference in the IPPv2x
    > document.

    But won't option 1 (write a new standard, reference it in IPP/2.x)
    still require prototyping, etc?

    Plus, I don't see how we are getting around the prototype requirements
    for 2.x - we *are* adding new content WRT version numbers, and that
    requires prototyping to do any kind of testing/validation between
    implementations.

    --
    ______________________________________________________________________
    Michael R Sweet                        Senior Printing System Engineer
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jul 31 2008 - 14:45:59 EDT