IPP> Comments on spec

From: wamwagner@comcast.net
Date: Mon Nov 24 2008 - 12:46:58 EST

  • Next message: Shah Bhatti: "IPP> IPP WG Slides for Dec. 4, 2008, PWG Meeting"

    In referring features of the current spec draft to others, I noticed that the IPP standards cited in section 4 (and elsewhere) are not keyed to the references in section 10, and that the IDs and names of the documents in section 4 are not always consistent with the formal names in section 10. It might be better to be consistent.

    Bill Wagner



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Nov 24 2008 - 12:47:15 EST