> I think the key wording from "A user or management application will never
> have to look at both the printer and the spooler, at the same time, for
> information regarding a specific job" is _for a specific job_. Our thinking
> is that once the job moves from the spooler to the printer, you can monitor
> the job in the printer. You don't have to be accumulating information from
> both the spooler and the printer about one job.
You may be right. We'll have to see how this plays in the real world.
...jay
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-- JK Martin | Email: jkm@underscore.com --
-- Underscore, Inc. | Voice: (603) 889-7000 --
-- 41C Sagamore Park Road | Fax: (603) 889-2699 --
-- Hudson, NH 03015-4915 | Web: http://www.underscore.com --
----------------------------------------------------------------------