JMP Mail Archive: Re: JMP> Re: Comments on the Job MIB version 0.8

Re: JMP> Re: Comments on the Job MIB version 0.8

JK Martin (jkm@underscore.com)
Thu, 17 Apr 1997 18:09:36 -0400 (EDT)

Hi Steve,

No real issue with your statement below, only a bit of curiosity:

> Yes, every table MUST be structured prefix.table.entry.object. There is
> also a convention to have the MIB divided into groups, each with a
> subtree.

Can this rationale be briefly described? Or perhaps a pointer to a
relevant discussion be given?

We know you're very busy, so anything you can say would be appreciated.

...jay