JMP Mail Archive: Re: JMP> jmJobState and jmJobStateReasonsTC [ISSUE: Are there any mandatory job states?]

Re: JMP> jmJobState and jmJobStateReasonsTC [ISSUE: Are there any mandatory job states?]

JK Martin (jkm@underscore.com)
Sun, 25 May 1997 15:26:45 -0400 (EDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: JK Martin: "JMP> Job state implementation questions for Unix-based print queues"
Previous message: Tom Hastings: "JMP> List of updated JMP objects and attributes"
Next in thread: Ron Bergman: "Re: JMP> jmJobState and jmJobStateReasonsTC [ISSUE: Are there any mandatory job states?]"

What happened to "pending" as a mandatory job state? I certainly hope
we don't relegate this important state to the "Conditionally Mandatory"
realm.

> The current draft lists processing, needsAttention, canceled, and completed
> as Mandatory. Since needsAttention has gone away, that leaves three
> states as mandatory: processing, canceled, and completed. Since we added
> aborted, I assume that aborted should be added to the mandatory list.
>
> The complicance at the end of the Job MIB spec also lists these states.
>
> [...snip...]
>
> Tom

Next message: JK Martin: "JMP> Job state implementation questions for Unix-based print queues"
Previous message: Tom Hastings: "JMP> List of updated JMP objects and attributes"
Next in thread: Ron Bergman: "Re: JMP> jmJobState and jmJobStateReasonsTC [ISSUE: Are there any mandatory job states?]"