JMP Mail Archive: Re: JMP> jmJobState and jmJobStateReasonsTC [ISSUE: Are there any mandatory job states?]

Re: JMP> jmJobState and jmJobStateReasonsTC [ISSUE: Are there any mandatory job states?]

JK Martin (jkm@underscore.com)
Tue, 27 May 1997 14:16:55 -0400 (EDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Harry Lewis: "Re: JMP> List of updated JMP objects and attributes"
Previous message: Harry Lewis: "Re: JMP> jmJobState and jmJobStateReasonsTC [ISSUE: Are ther"

Ron,

> The object jmJobState should be mandatory. All possible enums for this
> object must be reported if implemented and available to the agent. (I
> sent another email on this subject with more info earlier today.)
>
> Does this make more sense?

Yes! I like your wording. Can everyone else agree to this?

...jay

Next message: Harry Lewis: "Re: JMP> List of updated JMP objects and attributes"
Previous message: Harry Lewis: "Re: JMP> jmJobState and jmJobStateReasonsTC [ISSUE: Are ther"