JMP Mail Archive: Re: JMP> jmJobState and jmJobStateReasonsTC [ISSUE: Are ther

Re: JMP> jmJobState and jmJobStateReasonsTC [ISSUE: Are ther

Harry Lewis (harryl@us.ibm.com)
Tue, 27 May 1997 16:58:23 -0400

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Tom Hastings: "Re: JMP> HELD vs NEEDS-ATTENTION"
Previous message: Tom Hastings: "RE: IPP> Re: JMP> jmJobState and jmJobStateReasonsTC [ISSUE:"

I like Ron's wording...

> The object jmJobState should be mandatory. All possible enums for this
> object must be reported if implemented and available to the agent.

Harry Lewis - IBM Printing Systems

Next message: Tom Hastings: "Re: JMP> HELD vs NEEDS-ATTENTION"
Previous message: Tom Hastings: "RE: IPP> Re: JMP> jmJobState and jmJobStateReasonsTC [ISSUE:"