JMP Mail Archive: Re: JMP> jmJobState and jmJobStateReasonsTC [ISSUE: Are ther

Re: JMP> jmJobState and jmJobStateReasonsTC [ISSUE: Are ther

Harry Lewis (harryl@us.ibm.com)
Thu, 29 May 1997 12:03:35 -0400

I'd hate to think we might confuse the IETF...

>Again, we will certainly confuse the IETF if we redefine what mandatory
>means by using the defintion for conditionally mandatory as Ron has.

Yes, I think I see the clarity already ;-)

>We must, as we did for the Printer MIB jmGeneralReset, decide which
>values an agent must implement whether the device does or not
>and which values the agent need only implement if the device does.
>We must label the former Mandatory and the latter Conditionally Mandatory.

Harry Lewis - Individual