Since this proposed object has the same range as jmJobIndex, it
does not provide any added value. It will always be equal to
jmJobIndex.
ISSUE 89 - Add jmGeneralAttributesImplemented object with bits for
each attribute implemented
I do not know how valuable this object would be to a management
application. Unless Jay Martin and David Kellerman indicate strong
support, I would reject this request.
ISSUE 90 - The (MANDATORY) OCTET STRING objects should have a
minimum MAX size required
ISSUE 91 - The MANDATORY jobOwner attribute should have a minimum
MAX size required
I do not have a strong opinion on these issues. I would support
this as long as a strong objection is not raised
More on the other issues later.
Ron Bergman