The existing text:
"Furthermore, when implemented as with any MIB data, the
agent SHALL return these values when the reason applies and
SHALL NOT return them when the reason no longer applies
I hope everyone has a good weeked! I certainly will!
...Ron
On Fri, 29 Aug 1997, Tom Hastings wrote:
> At 18:46 08/28/97 PDT, Ron Bergman wrote:
> >Tom,
> >
> >I understand exactly what you you mean. That is not the issue.
> >
> >What I was trying to say in my new wording is that the Job Monitor Ap
> >should read the Job State Reasons every time he attempted to update (i.e.
> >read) the job state. He may read the job state many times before it
> >changes. My meaning of "update" was "the monitor reads the job state".
> >
> >So let me reword again:
> >
> > "Since the Job State Reasons will be more dynamic than the Job State,
> > it is recommended that a job monitoring application read this object
> > every time jmJobState is read."
> >
> >Is this better?
>
> Much better! I can live with it.
>