> Another thing I think this decision will force that we are really not
> addressing is the last bit of Harald's statement "as a protocol under PWG
> control" Do we know exactly what this means?
>
> Harry Lewis - IBM Printing Systems
Doesn't this mean that the PWG advertises the protocol and retains
all related documents in a publicly available repository, and that
the PWG maintains authoritative control on the specifications?
Are there other issues? Do you think the PWG is not currently able
to do these things? If not, what must be done to make this happen,
assuming the PWG desires to do this?
...jay
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-- JK Martin | Email: jkm@underscore.com --
-- Underscore, Inc. | Voice: (603) 889-7000 --
-- 41C Sagamore Park Road | Fax: (603) 889-2699 --
-- Hudson, NH 03051-4915 | Web: http://www.underscore.com --
----------------------------------------------------------------------