>PWG advertises the protocol and retains
>all related documents in a publicly available repository, and that
>the PWG maintains authoritative control on the specifications?
question. The rubber
need to meet the road with JMP and probably FIN.
Harry Lewis - IBM Printing Systems
jkm@underscore.com on 11/07/97 04:27:58 PM
Please respond to jkm@underscore.com @ internet
To: Harry Lewis/Boulder/IBM@ibmus
cc: jmp@pwg.org @ internet, rbergma@dpc.com @ internet, lpyoung@lexmark=
.com @
internet, rturner@sharplabs.com @ internet, chrisw@iwl.com @ internet,
Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no @ internet
Subject: Re: JMP> Job MIB Standard direction
Harry Lewis wrote:
> Another thing I think this decision will force that we are really not=
> addressing is the last bit of Harald's statement "as a protocol unde=
r PWG
> control" Do we know exactly what this means?
>
> Harry Lewis - IBM Printing Systems
Doesn't this mean that the PWG advertises the protocol and retains
all related documents in a publicly available repository, and that
the PWG maintains authoritative control on the specifications?
Are there other issues? Do you think the PWG is not currently able
to do these things? If not, what must be done to make this happen,
assuming the PWG desires to do this?
...jay
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-- JK Martin | Email: jkm@underscore.com --
-- Underscore, Inc. | Voice: (603) 889-7000 --
-- 41C Sagamore Park Road | Fax: (603) 889-2699 --
-- Hudson, NH 03051-4915 | Web: http://www.underscore.com --
----------------------------------------------------------------------
=