JMP Mail Archive: JMP> Re: Job MIB Standard direction

JMP> Re: Job MIB Standard direction

Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no
Sat, 08 Nov 1997 09:54:57 +0100

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Ron Bergman: "JMP> Re: PWG> Formal PWG process for assigning PWG enterprise numbers"
Previous message: Jay Martin: "JMP> Formal PWG process for assigning PWG enterprise numbers"

Harry,
The statement "under PWG control" means that if the PWG claims that
the Job MIB version 2 is defined like this-and-this, the IETF won't
protest.
If the PWG were to do the same thing with a standards-track document,
the IETF will insist that it ain't so until it's been approved
by the IETF process.
We've had several attempts at groups saying that they're "defining
the next version of standard XXX", while not consulting the IETF.
That is WRONG.

Harald A

Next message: Ron Bergman: "JMP> Re: PWG> Formal PWG process for assigning PWG enterprise numbers"
Previous message: Jay Martin: "JMP> Formal PWG process for assigning PWG enterprise numbers"