Ron Bergman
Dataproducts Corp.
On Fri, 7 Nov 1997, Harry Lewis wrote:
> Jay, Yes, I believe the PWG is capable of this. I just don't think we have
> ever stated it as such...
>
> >PWG advertises the protocol and retains
> >all related documents in a publicly available repository, and that
> >the PWG maintains authoritative control on the specifications?
>
> From time to time we've danced around the "is the PWG a real stds body"
> question. The rubber
> need to meet the road with JMP and probably FIN.
>
> Harry Lewis - IBM Printing Systems
>
>
>
>
>
>
> jkm@underscore.com on 11/07/97 04:27:58 PM
> Please respond to jkm@underscore.com @ internet
> To: Harry Lewis/Boulder/IBM@ibmus
> cc: jmp@pwg.org @ internet, rbergma@dpc.com @ internet, lpyoung@lexmark.com @
> internet, rturner@sharplabs.com @ internet, chrisw@iwl.com @ internet,
> Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no @ internet
> Subject: Re: JMP> Job MIB Standard direction
>
>
> Harry Lewis wrote:
>
> > Another thing I think this decision will force that we are really not
> > addressing is the last bit of Harald's statement "as a protocol under PWG
> > control" Do we know exactly what this means?
> >
> > Harry Lewis - IBM Printing Systems
>
> Doesn't this mean that the PWG advertises the protocol and retains
> all related documents in a publicly available repository, and that
> the PWG maintains authoritative control on the specifications?
>
> Are there other issues? Do you think the PWG is not currently able
> to do these things? If not, what must be done to make this happen,
> assuming the PWG desires to do this?
>
> ...jay
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -- JK Martin | Email: jkm@underscore.com --
> -- Underscore, Inc. | Voice: (603) 889-7000 --
> -- 41C Sagamore Park Road | Fax: (603) 889-2699 --
> -- Hudson, NH 03051-4915 | Web: http://www.underscore.com --
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>