I will check with Tom on the first issue.
Yes, we are trying to get the version 1.0 MIB published as an RFC as
agreed over a year ago. It may be either an Informational or Experimental
RFC.
Ron Bergman
Dataproducts Corp.
On Tue, 16 Mar 1999, Ira McDonald wrote:
> Hi Ron,
>
> Don't the current Internet-Drafts still have the typographic
> errors in the MODULE-IDENTITY macros that I pointed out on
> the list when they were posted? At least in SMICng-98,
> those lines don't compile (too many digits in a UTC timestamp).
>
> I assume it's the V1.0 (pre-mirror-table) that you meant to
> send forward as an Informational RFC to the IESG and not
> the V2.0 (mirror-table, et al)?
>
> Cheers,
> - Ira McDonald
> High North Inc
>
>