PMP Mail Archive: Re: PMP> Unavailable vs. Broken - review by April 17th

Re: PMP> Unavailable vs. Broken - review by April 17th

Chuck Adams (adamsc@pogo.WV.TEK.COM)
Mon, 13 Apr 1998 14:33:41 -0700

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Ron Bergman: "RE: PMP>Unavailable vs. Broken - review by April 17th"
Previous message: Stuart Rowley: "Re: PMP> Unavailable vs. Broken - review by April 17th"
Maybe in reply to: Harry Lewis: "PMP> Unavailable vs. Broken - review by April 17th"
Next in thread: Matt Young: "Re: PMP> Unavailable vs. Broken - review by April 17th"

Tektronix's current implementation uses Unavailable because Broken.

Chuck Adams

Next message: Ron Bergman: "RE: PMP>Unavailable vs. Broken - review by April 17th"
Previous message: Stuart Rowley: "Re: PMP> Unavailable vs. Broken - review by April 17th"
Maybe in reply to: Harry Lewis: "PMP> Unavailable vs. Broken - review by April 17th"
Next in thread: Matt Young: "Re: PMP> Unavailable vs. Broken - review by April 17th"