>> I disagree. Why should BITS not be imported? It is a textual
>> convention defined in RFC1902.
>
>BITS is neither a textual convention, nor does RFC 1902 define any textual
>conventions. Textual conventions are defined in RFC 1903. Both RFC 1902
>and 1903 define BITS, but they are as [part of] the OBJECT-TYPE and
>TEXTUAL-CONVENTION macros:
You are correct. I will remove it from the imports clause and keep
its use in the particular object using it.
Thanks,
Bobby