Printer Services Mail Archive: PS> [PSI]: minutes 01/14/03

PS> [PSI]: minutes 01/14/03

From: BERKEMA,ALAN C (HP-Roseville,ex1) (alan.berkema@hp.com)
Date: Tue Jan 14 2003 - 23:22:37 EST

  • Next message: BERKEMA,ALAN C (HP-Roseville,ex1): "PS> [PSI]: Process Change Proposal"

      PSI Working Group:
      *Alan Berkema *Dave Hall Gail Songer
       Jerry Thasher *Harry Lewis *Ted Tronson
      *Peter Mierau Peter Zehler Paul Tykodi
       Bob Taylor Don Levinstone Lee Farrell
       Don Wright Kirk Ocke *Ira Mcdonald
       Amir Shahindoust *Alain Regnier
      
      * = attendance
      
     01/14/03 Agenda
     1) Discovery - upnp-dev
     2) Look at mDNS-SD examples
     3) Spec review topics

     01/14/03 Minutes:

    0) Rev 0.95a (candidate for 0.95) was posted on the morning
    of January 13 2003. This gives us a week to review before the
    start of the week of PWG F2F meetings. Page turner review
    at PSI F2F January 24 2003.

    When reviewing this spec for the F2F please think about practical
    implementation details such as how many Jobs a Target Device should be
    able to support concurrently.

    Ideally, at the F2F we will identify what needs to be fixed to have
    a last call for comments before we promote the spec to revision 0.95

    At 0.95 the spec will be theoretically frozen. Changes to the spec will
    be conducted via an errata process. One exception is the WSDL itself.
    The WSDL will evolve through versioning since an errata process
    does not really make sense for WSDL, we really want an entire latest
    greatest version of the WSDL which includes all bug fixes.

    1) Looked at the upnp-dev from:
    http://www.upnp.org/download/Printer_Definition_v1_020808.pdfII.pdf
    The Device Description is described in section 3.
    We need to define the mandatory fields for both upnp-dev and for LDAPv3.

    2) mDNS-Sd examples at F2F

    3) What do we need for the HTTPS port? psi-port+1 is no longer being
    approved by the IESG. A different path is recommended. Dave captured the
    ideas
    as proposed changes to psi-spec rev 0.95a (in a separate document).
    Part of this approach uses an HTTP layer header for security "upgrade"
    need more details here.

    ----------------------------
    Action: Status from 01/07/03

    Action: Send SSDP example to Dave
    Owner: Alan
    Status: Done

    Action: Investigate what needs to be done for UPnP-dev device description
    via UPnP Print Device documentation.
    Owner: Alan
    Status: Done

    Action: Send latest SLPv2 LDAPv3 examples to Dave
    Owner: Ira
    Status: Done

    Action: Send new proposals for Reference and Target Device by afternoon of
    01/09/03
    Owner: Ira
    Status: Done

    Action: e-mail discussion of state of current tool kit issues
    Owner: Dave
    Status: Done

    Action: Determine if Web Sphere tools have similar limitations
    Owner: Alan
    Status: Open

    From 01/07/03
    General spec discussion:

    Need some Normative statements on authentication:

    Discovery? Normative part of spec or developer's guide?
    I think discovery is what Bluetooth calls "process mandatory"
    This means that, if a feature (such as a discovery protocol) is
    used, it is used in the specified manner.

    Interop events?
    As soon as we have a few companies that are ready HP will host
    an event, off cycle from PWG meetings. How many devices do we need?
    Need interop test criteria such as what features will be supported
    what discovery is used etc.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 14 2003 - 23:22:55 EST