Printer Services Mail Archive: RE: PS> Soap with attachments

RE: PS> Soap with attachments - relation to SOAP 1.1

From: Harry Lewis (harryl@us.ibm.com)
Date: Wed Apr 02 2003 - 18:43:16 EST

  • Next message: Hastings, Tom N: "PS> RE: SM> Summary of 9 recent ISSUES/fixes for the IPP Document obj ect tele con, Thur, 4/3/03, 12-3 EST (9-12 PST)"

    Actually, I think that DIME had more momentum at one point but I believe
    the focus is now on SOAP w/attachments (including Microsoft and IBM).
    > > http://www.gotdotnet.com/team/jeffsch/paswa/paswa61.html
    > > http://www.gotdotnet.com/team/jeffsch/paswa/paswa61.pdf
    > > http://www.gotdotnet.com/team/jeffsch/paswa/paswa62.doc
    ----------------------------------------------
    Harry Lewis
    IBM Printing Systems
    ----------------------------------------------

    "REVEL,DAN (HP-Vancouver,ex1)" <dan_revel@hp.com>
    03/19/2003 10:21 AM
     
            To: Harry Lewis/Boulder/IBM@IBMUS, ps@pwg.org
            cc:
            Subject: RE: PS> Soap with attachments - relation to SOAP
    1.1

    SOAP-attachments was a W3C submission, Microsoft et al. made a competing
    proposal, DIME, that seems to have more momentum:
     
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnwebsrv/html/dimewsattch.asp
     
     
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Harry Lewis [mailto:harryl@us.ibm.com]
    Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 9:59 AM
    To: ps@pwg.org
    Subject: PS> Soap with attachments - relation to SOAP 1.1

    See http://www.w3.org/TR/SOAP-attachments section 4. Seems this has been
    around for quite a while. I suspect we'd have better interop than we
    anticipate.
    ----------------------------------------------
    Harry Lewis
    IBM Printing Systems
    ----------------------------------------------

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Apr 02 2003 - 18:43:24 EST