Printer Services Mail Archive: RE: PS> Mandatory binding

RE: PS> Mandatory binding

From: Harry Lewis (harryl@us.ibm.com)
Date: Tue Sep 09 2003 - 14:49:22 EDT

  • Next message: McDonald, Ira: "PS> PSI call on Tues 16 Sept??"

    I guess we're saying it is not really necessary for interoperability that
    all PSI/1.0 clients and servers MUST support the HTTP/1.1 transport
    binding when the WSDL can call out the binding.
    ----------------------------------------------
    Harry Lewis
    Chairman - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
    http://www.pwg.org
    IBM Printing Systems
    http://www.ibm.com/printers
    303-924-5337
    ----------------------------------------------

    "McDonald, Ira" <imcdonald@sharplabs.com>
    09/09/2003 12:41 PM

    To
    Harry Lewis/Boulder/IBM@IBMUS, ps@pwg.org
    cc

    Subject
    RE: PS> Mandatory binding

    Hi,

    To clarify a little...

    PSI conformance print services and target devices MUST publish
    URLs for the WSDL for each of their supported interfaces (see
    my revised conformance requirements message earlier today).

    Tools exist that convert WSDL to appropriate SOAP messages.

    A "SOAP binding" is a definition of SOAP message _transport_
    over HTTP, SMTP, BEEP, or whatever (those three are currently
    standardized).

    For interoperability, clients and servers need to be able to
    consume and validate published WSDL definitions of other PSI
    servers.

    For interoperability, all PSI/1.0 clients and servers MUST
    support the HTTP/1.1 transport binding of SOAP/1.1.

    Separately, PSI/1.0 doesn't (yet) require support for UDDI
    based discovery. I question the desirability of adding a
    UDDI infrastructure dependence to all PSI/1.0 implementations.

    Cheers,
    - Ira McDonald
      High North Inc

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Harry Lewis [mailto:harryl@us.ibm.com]
    Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 12:43 PM
    To: ps@pwg.org
    Subject: PS> Mandatory binding

    During today's conference call the topic of a mandatory binding came up.

    We would prefer to publish the interface and binding WSDL separately and
    define a discovery method. We're not sure if UDDI is too coarse a
    discovery
    method for this purpose.
    ----------------------------------------------
    Harry Lewis
    Chairman - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
    http://www.pwg.org
    IBM Printing Systems
    http://www.ibm.com/printers
    303-924-5337
    ----------------------------------------------



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Sep 09 2003 - 14:49:29 EDT