PWG Mail Archive: (no subject)

(no subject)

Harry Lewis (harryl@vnet.ibm.com)
Sat, 31 Aug 96 13:52:42 MDT

Subject:LPR/LPD

Jay, I agree.

As secretary, I believe I reflected the discussion fairly accurately,
but I think your recommendations are actually what we meant. I would
like to have the record stand that, for the SanDiego "port number"
discussion, we should replace UNIX TCP/IP with LPR/LPD.

>In the "Channels Group" section of the minutes:
>
> "For UNIX TCP/IP it would be a port number. For other protocols it
> might be something else."
>
>I believe the phrase "LPD/LPR" should replace "UNIX TCP/IP" here.

Harry