For those of you who have not looked at the latest MIB, here is the
wording that was approved:
chPort9100(11), -- Bi-directional printing protocol
-- utilizing TCP port 9101 for control
-- and TCP port 9100 for data.
chAppSocket(12), -- Adobe Systems, Inc.
To: pwg%pwg.org @ interlock.lexmark.com @ SMTP
cc: (bcc: Lloyd Young)
From: harryl @ vnet.ibm.com>" <harryl%VNET.IBM.COM@interlock.lexmark.com
("Harry Lewis) @ SMTP
Date: 08/31/96 01:57:07 PM
Subject: Port9100 clarifications
I must admit, as secratary at SanDiego, I did a poor job at capturing this
one. I thought it was a note from Bill Wagner. Lloyd, can you fill in the
details on this one?
>The PMP minutes on this topic were very brief on this topic:
>
> "Closed -- Port 9100 and AppSocket clarifications were accepted."
>
>Exactly which set of clarifications were accepted? This topic thread
>on the mailing list hadn't been resolved on the mailing list.
>
> ...jay
Harry