> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zehler, Peter [SMTP:Peter.Zehler@usa.xerox.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 24, 1998 4:32 AM
> To: Manros, Carl-Uno B
> Cc: Pwg@pwg.org
> Subject: RE: PWG> Latest Status for IPP
>
> Carl-Uno,
> I am in favor of submitting IPP to the IETF as informational rfc's.
> Pete
>
> Peter Zehler
> XEROX
> Networked Products Business Unit
> Email: Peter.Zehler@usa.xerox.com
> Voice: (716) 265-8755
> FAX: (716) 265-8792
> US Mail: Peter Zehler
> Xerox Corp.
> 800 Phillips Rd.
> M/S 111-02J
> Webster NY, 14580-9701
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: don@lexmark.com [SMTP:don@lexmark.com]
> Sent: Sunday, August 23, 1998 4:15 PM
> To: Manros, Carl-Uno B
> Cc: Pwg@pwg.org
> Subject: Re: PWG> Latest Status for IPP
>
> Since, from at least an IPP perspective, I don't think the IETF/IESG
> has added
> one penny of value publishing the June 30th drafts as
> "informational" is fine
> with me. What we do as leaders in the print industry is clearly
> more important.
>
> Since the IETF/IESG clearly has no interest in IPP becoming their
> standard I
> would recommend we completely remove the IETF/IESG copyrights and
> replace them
> with PWG copyrights to preserve our freedom of action.
>
> **********************************************
> * Don Wright don@lexmark.com *
> * Product Manager, Strategic Alliances *
> * Lexmark International *
> * 740 New Circle Rd *
> * Lexington, Ky 40550 *
> * 606-232-4808 (phone) 606-232-6740 (fax) *
> **********************************************
>
>
>
>
>
> "Manros, Carl-Uno B"
> <cmanros%cp10.es.xerox.com@interlock.lexmark.com> on
> 08/22/98 10:26:14 AM
>
> To: pwg%pwg.org@interlock.lexmark.com
> cc: (bcc: Don Wright/Lex/Lexmark)
> bcc: Don Wright/Lex/Lexmark
> Subject: PWG> Latest Status for IPP
>
>
>
>
> All,
>
> I am sending this message to the PWG members rather than to the IPP
> DL.
> Latest news from Keith Moore seems to indicate that he wants to
> enforce
> what was in his recent document:
>
> On the use of HTTP as a Substrate for Other Protocols
> <draft-iesg-using-http-00.txt>
>
> which would mean development of new not yet existing security
> features,
> which we all know can take a loooong time.
>
> He indicates that we can probably get the IPP RFCs out if we were
> prepared to drop the aim of getting them on the standards track.
>
> What is your reaction? How many of you would be willing to let the
> IPP
> documents be downgraded to "Informational" instead?
>
> If I can get a quick feedback from you on the PWG DL and there is
> sufficiently much support for that, I may be able to negotiate a
> deal
> with our Area Directors along those lines next week in Chicago.
>
> Carl-Uno
>
>
> Carl-Uno Manros
> Principal Engineer - Advanced Printing Standards - Xerox Corporation
> 701 S. Aviation Blvd., El Segundo, CA, M/S: ESAE-231
> Phone +1-310-333 8273, Fax +1-310-333 5514
> Email: manros@cp10.es.xerox.com
>
>