PWG Mail Archive: PWG> RE: SM> Interface / Document revis

PWG> RE: SM> Interface / Document revisioning Working Draft

From: TAYLOR,BOB (HP-Vancouver,ex1) (bobt@hp.com)
Date: Wed Feb 12 2003 - 16:35:04 EST

  • Next message: HALL,DAVID (HP-Vancouver,ex1): "PWG> RE: SM> Interface / Document revisioning Working Draft"

    Hi all,

    One question on this since I missed last week's meeting. When we're
    actually
    declaring namespaces, the recommendation appeared to be of the style:

    http://msdn.microsoft.com/2002/04/foo

    We are right now doing the following:

    http://msdn.microsoft.com/foo/2002/04/

    I.e., pretty much the same model, but put the version/date after the service
    declaration rather than in the middle of it. I think this makes more sense
    - was
    there a specific reason to put the version/date in the middle instead of on
    the end?

    bt

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: HALL,DAVID (HP-Vancouver,ex1) [mailto:dhall@hp.com]
    > Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 8:26 AM
    > To: 'sm@pwg.org'; 'pwg@pwg.org'
    > Subject: SM> Interface / Document revisioning Working Draft
    >
    >
    > Hey All..
    >
    > Attached are the notes from Tuesdays PSI meeting.. I
    > apologize for the late
    > publication, but I've been absolutely swamped since Tuesday!
    >
    > Keep in mind that this is a work in progress...
    >
    > Dave
    >
    > <<Spec Stuff.doc>>
    >

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 12 2003 - 16:35:23 EST