The whole string (<namespace>/<interfacename>/<interfaceversion>) is really
the namespace in XML - the www.pwg.org part is just a "root".
Thinking about how we'll organize hosting the schemas/WSDL, it seems more
natural to do:
<namespaceroot>/<interfacename>/<interfaceversion>
That way I find the interface, then the version I want. If you do it
like:
<namespaceroot>/<interfaceversion>/<interfacename>
You go to the version/date to find the interface, which feels really
unnatural.
bt
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HALL,DAVID (HP-Vancouver,ex1)
> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 3:10 PM
> To: TAYLOR,BOB (HP-Vancouver,ex1); 'sm@pwg.org'; 'pwg@pwg.org'
> Subject: RE: SM> Interface / Document revisioning Working Draft
>
>
> One reason that I can think of is that I think of the version
> as part of the namespace, and the "foo" to be the interface name.
>
> <namespace>/<interfacename>
>
> Hence
>
> http://www.pwg.org/ps/2003/02/12/JobControlInterface
>
> The flip side of the argument is that the namespace is:
> http://www.pwg.org/ps, and the interface is
> JobControlInterface/2003/02/12
>
> Giving us:
>
> <namespace>/<interfacename>/<interfaceversion>
>
> I'm not sure what the right answer is..
>
> Dave
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TAYLOR,BOB (HP-Vancouver,ex1)
> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 1:35 PM
> To: HALL,DAVID (HP-Vancouver,ex1); 'sm@pwg.org'; 'pwg@pwg.org'
> Subject: RE: SM> Interface / Document revisioning Working Draft
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> One question on this since I missed last week's meeting.
> When we're actually
> declaring namespaces, the recommendation appeared to be of the style:
>
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/2002/04/foo
>
> We are right now doing the following:
>
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/foo/2002/04/
>
> I.e., pretty much the same model, but put the version/date
> after the service
> declaration rather than in the middle of it. I think this
> makes more sense - was
> there a specific reason to put the version/date in the middle
> instead of on
> the end?
>
> bt
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: HALL,DAVID (HP-Vancouver,ex1) [mailto:dhall@hp.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 8:26 AM
> > To: 'sm@pwg.org'; 'pwg@pwg.org'
> > Subject: SM> Interface / Document revisioning Working Draft
> >
> >
> > Hey All..
> >
> > Attached are the notes from Tuesdays PSI meeting.. I
> > apologize for the late
> > publication, but I've been absolutely swamped since Tuesday!
> >
> > Keep in mind that this is a work in progress...
> >
> > Dave
> >
> > <<Spec Stuff.doc>>
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 12 2003 - 18:15:12 EST