PWG Mail Archive: RE: PWG> PWG Process update

RE: PWG> PWG Process update

From: Rick Seeler (rseeler@adobe.com)
Date: Sat Feb 22 2003 - 13:28:19 EST

  • Next message: McDonald, Ira: "RE: PWG> [PDF of] PWG Process update"

    One question about the new process:
     
    How does one know that the specification is at a stable enough state to
    begin developing prototypes? I believe it may be hard to convince any
    company to invest in prototype development when there's no guarantee (or
    voting process) to keep the standard from changing wildly in the interim.
    If that step is "Candidate Standard", then the prototyping should come after
    voting to go to "Candidate Standard" and not before.
     
    Maybe that was the intent and it's just not stated properly. If the
    statement "A Candidate Standard should not be approved unless it is
    supported by prototypes and thought to be ready for implementation." were
    moved out of section 4.5 and into section 4.6 (and the word "Candidate" were
    removed), I'd withdraw my objection.
     
    I saw the process as this:
     
    1) Write the Requirements.
    2) Vote on the Charter.
    3) Write/modify the Specification. Once it seems solid...
    4) Vote on the spec.
    5) If the vote fails, go back to step 3.
    6) If the vote passes, it's now a "Candidate Standard".
    7) Find companies willing to do prototype work.
    8) Create/modify prototypes.
    9) If problems with spec are found, go to step 3 or create/modify an errata
    document and go to step 8.
    10) Do interop testing. If it fails, go back to step 8.
    11) if interop passes, vote.
    12) if the vote fails, go back to step 3 or create/modify an errata document
    and go to step 11.
    13) If vote passes - it's now a "Standard".
    14) Celebrate!
     
    Does this not seem reasonable?
     
    (I'm sure there will be no shortage or responses to this question. ;-)
     
    -Rick

    -----Original Message-----
    From: owner-pwg@pwg.org [mailto:owner-pwg@pwg.org] On Behalf Of Harry Lewis
    Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 9:42 PM
    To: pwg@pwg.org
    Subject: PWG> PWG Process update

    An update has been posted. Thanks to Dennis for adding some corrections,
    observations and pointing out some issues (yellow). We've also added a
    diagram like we had in the old process. Hope it is helpful.
     <ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/general/process/pwg-process20-20030221.doc>
    ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/general/process/pwg-process20-20030221.doc
    ----------------------------------------------
    Harry Lewis
    IBM Printing Systems
    ----------------------------------------------



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 22 2003 - 13:30:25 EST