Since I'm about to post documents for CR, I went through the file naming
section in detail.
1. For a Working Draft (e.g.), the name is of the form:
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/wg/wd/wd-wg10-yyyymmdd.pdf
But if a Working Group publishes multiple projects, shouldn't "wg10" be
replaced by something project specific? And does the local file name have
to include the group name somewhere (for global uniqueness) or will that be
handled by the PWG standard number assigned later?
So, if the CR group publishes a working draft called "The
RepertoireSupported Element" what should I call it:
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/cr/wd/wd-cr10-yyyymmdd.pdf
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/cr/wd/wd-rs10-yyyymmdd.pdf
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/cr/wd/wd-crrs10-yyyymmdd.pdf
2. Can we use the http: URL rather than ftp: in references to these
documents? Seems friendlier.
------------------------------------------
Elliott Bradshaw
Director, Software Engineering
Oak Technology Imaging Group
781 638-7534
Harry Lewis
<harryl@us.ibm To: pwg@pwg.org
.com> cc:
Sent by: Subject: PWG> Process
owner-pwg@pwg.
org
05/21/2003
07:04 PM
There is really no last call process for the process document ;-). Please
review and prepare to try and close this formally at the Portland plenary.
If you can't make Portland please share you comments ahead of time so they
may be incorporated.
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/general/process/pwg-process20-20030414.pdf
----------------------------------------------
Harry Lewis
Chairman - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
http://www.pwg.org
IBM Printing Systems
http://www.ibm.com/printers
303-924-5337
----------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 29 2003 - 08:51:15 EDT