01-C.htm
Harry,
What's
the fundamental goal here? To revisit the schedule for all future meetings
in the year, or just up to (but not including) October?
Is
there any reason not to try to "squeeze in" four [newly scheduled] meetings into
the remainder of the year? [For example, June 2-6, August
4-9, October 6-10 (why not still hold this in New York?), and December 1-5
seem reasonable goals for future meetings. Eight week separation on
average, but still allowing four face-to-face meetings for the rest of the
year.
Given
that this organization has already cut down this year's schedule of meetings to
only five, I would think that we should avoid reducing it to four if we
can.
Any
thoughts?
lee
===========================
Lee Farrell
Canon
Development Americas
110 Innovation
Drive
Irvine, CA 92612
(949) 856-7163 - voice
(949) 856-7510 - fax
lee.farrell@cda.canon.com
===========================
To
recover from cancelation of D.C. I've prepared a scheduling guide. ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/general/misc/DCRecovery.pdf
As you can see, two weeks in June appear to
be the best alternatives. Please identify any conflicts / alignments I have
missed. We need to settle on the next meeting date quickly so people can
reschedule their canceled flights. People flying AA seem to have the shortest
amount of time and we may not be able to reschedule within their 2 day deadline!
In this case I recommend these people reschedule for the Provo meeting in
October. PLEASE HOLD DISCUSSION OF
THIS TOPIC ON pwg@pwg.org NOT
pwg-announce! ----------------------------------------------
Harry Lewis
Chairman - ISTO Printer Working
Group
IBM Printing Systems
----------------------------------------------