> I'd like to discuss that one on the reflector.
> Michael's statement:
> > - In the first tab, labels are above the control widget, on the second
> > labels are on the left. Is this left to the implementation? (Note that
> > from a UI point of view, it's quite hard to guess the best label
> > position that fits the human eye).
> Expected comment and good point.
> Yes, this is left to the implementation in the current design.
> I understand your concerns.
> This issue is at the border of the design. Once we dive into this, we'll
> seeing other valid requirements. And my personal judgement is that this is
> likely platform specific and rather subjective, too.
> If it were my driver, I'd precalculate the whole user interface during
> installation of the driver and create something like a preprocessed
> structure (BTW: I'd do that with the whole device description).
> My default arrangement would be 'label left of control'. While
> the UI structure I'll do some calculations. I'd have some ideas of a
> width for certain controls and labels. Additionally I'd have some idea
> my maximum UI. If I'd blow it up during my preprocessing, I'd have to
> all over again with a fallback. The first fallback may be to arrange
> at top of control.
> So my personal driver may never show a label top of control without a
> problem popping up.
> Valid comment, but conscious limitation of current design.
> Other people to second either side of the statement???
> Norbert Schade
> 69 Prescott Drive
> North Chelmsford, MA 01863
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jun 10 2003 - 11:43:09 EDT