Web-based Imaging Management Services: WIMS> RE: PWG-ANNOUNC

WIMS> RE: PWG-ANNOUNCE> FW: Pls review: draft-black-snmp-uri-06.txt

From: McDonald, Ira (imcdonald@sharplabs.com)
Date: Thu Aug 05 2004 - 13:15:28 EDT

  • Next message: McDonald, Ira: "RE: WIMS> Conf mins posted"

    Hi Harry,
     
    Ignore all the parameters in the 'snmp:' URI scheme (they're for
    direct SNMP access only). Just specify a simple host name.
    An absolute path after host name is likely to be less portable
    (SNMP listeners take over port 161 entirely on a system).
     
    Cheers,
    - Ira
     

    Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
    Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
    PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839
    phone: +1-906-494-2434
    email: imcdonald@sharplabs.com

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Harry Lewis [mailto:harryl@us.ibm.com]
    Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 12:29 AM
    To: McDonald, Ira
    Cc: wims@pwg.org
    Subject: Re: PWG-ANNOUNCE> FW: Pls review: draft-black-snmp-uri-06.txt

    Ira, in today's call you said we should use the SNMP URI for SourceURI in
    SendReport when the Proxy is dealing with an SNMP based managed entity. We
    used a simple example like snmp://ibm.com/myPrinter. Reading through the
    SNMP URI scheme draft it looks more like a SUBSTITUTE for WIMS (of course,
    not entirely). In the draft, the SNMP URI can designate a specific OID,
    range of OIDs, MIB walks etc! I'm not clear on the relationship between our
    use of the term ("SNMP URI" for the agent closest to the managed entity) and
    the definitions I'm reading in the draft!
    ----------------------------------------------
    Harry Lewis
    IBM STSM
    Chairman - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
    http://www.pwg.org
    IBM Printing Systems
    http://www.ibm.com/printers
    303-924-5337
    ----------------------------------------------

    "McDonald, Ira" <imcdonald@sharplabs.com>
    Sent by: owner-pwg-announce@pwg.org

    07/29/2004 08:59 AM

    To
    "'pwg-announce@pwg.org'" <pwg-announce@pwg.org>

    cc

    Subject
    PWG-ANNOUNCE> FW: Pls review: draft-black-snmp-uri-06.txt

            

    Hi,

    The SNMP URI scheme is soon to enter IETF last call.
    Please take a look at it before 13 August and provide
    feedback to the SNMPv3 list (see below) or send it to
    me and I'll forward it.

    Note that PWG WIMS depends on this URI scheme for
    identifying legacy management agents.

    Cheers,
    - Ira

    Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
    Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
    PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839
    phone: +1-906-494-2434
    email: imcdonald@sharplabs.com

    -----Original Message-----
    From: owner-snmpv3@lists.tislabs.com
    [mailto:owner-snmpv3@lists.tislabs.com]On Behalf Of Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
    Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 4:34 PM
    To: Snmpv3-wg (E-mail)
    Subject: Pls review: draft-black-snmp-uri-06.txt

    SNMP ethusiasts,

    This document is in my queue to consider for publication
    as a Proposed Standard. Before I do a 4-week IETF Last Call
    I would like to get some feedback from SNMP developers/users.

    Pls respond by August 13 at the latest.

    Not sure if Keith and David are on this mailing list, so
    if you have comments you want them to see, I prefer that
    you copy them.

    Thanks,
    Bert



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 05 2004 - 13:15:40 EDT