Web-based Imaging Management Services: WIMS> CIM> Good ne

WIMS> CIM> Good news on PWG-CIM alignment work

From: Richard_Landau@Dell.com
Date: Thu Jul 21 2005 - 15:38:56 EDT

  • Next message: Harry Lewis: "RE: WIMS> CIM - July 20 Minutes"

    > Dear PWG members,
    >
    > After consulting with my local DMTF expert about the process that we
    > should follow for the CIM realignment work, I have good news and
    > really good news.
    >
    > First, the really good news: the process of updating the CIM schema
    > will be much simpler and less involved than I previously thought.
    >
    > - The modeling within CIM will be done by the DMTF liaison group, in
    > this case the Core Schema WG. The PWG, as the alliance partner,
    > supplies the technical information about the changes needed or
    > desired, technical descriptions, spec wording, etc., which is the
    > technical heavy lifting.
    >
    > - The CIM schema change requests (CRs) will be written by the DMTF
    > liaison group, the Core Schema WG. This is the process heavy lifting.
    >
    >
    > - The "education" period seriously goes in both directions: the DMTF
    > has to become familiar with the printer device model embodied in the
    > Printer MIB, and the PWG has to become familiar with the CIM schema in
    > general and the CIM model of the printer device in particular. I
    > assume that each group will be need to be involved in indoctrinating
    > the other.
    >
    > Now, the other good news is that the DMTF liaison person is John
    > Crandall, who is said to be kinder, gentler, and very helpful. The
    > only bad news is that Harry Lewis, as the PWG liaison person, has yet
    > another task to occupy his free time. And we will have to find some
    > time for concalls when subsets of the two groups can meet.
    >
    > I have attached a couple representative simple CRs from the SMWG. You
    > can see that the material required is pretty straightforward:
    > rationale, details, issues and responses. More complex CRs that may
    > go through several ballot cycles tend to be much longer than these
    > simple examples, but the structure is the same.
    >
    > We can discuss any of these points at length next week.
    >
    > rick
    >
    > PS: We discussed using a prefix in email subject lines to enable
    > recognition or sorting of messages on this WIMS sub-topic. (Like the
    > "CIM>" that I included above.) Did we decide on a string to use? If
    > so, I apologize for not employing it here.
    >
    > -------------------------
    > Richard_Landau@dell.com, System Mgt Arch & Stds
    > +1-512-728-9023, One Dell Way, RR5-3 Box 8352, Round Rock, TX 78682
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 21 2005 - 15:39:08 EDT