Web-based Imaging Management Services: RE: WIMS> CIM> A f

RE: WIMS> CIM> A few notes from today's concall with CIM Core WG

From: McDonald, Ira (imcdonald@sharplabs.com)
Date: Fri Sep 30 2005 - 13:33:06 EDT

  • Next message: Harry Lewis: "Re: WIMS> CIM> A few notes from today's concall with CIM Core WG"

    Hi Rick,

    I share your frustration that we were left hanging about CIM Core
    working contacts and CR guidance.

    I guess we try to write a 'low hanging fruit' CR (editorial only).

    We could decide NOT to deprecate the misplaced 'default-xxx' properties
    in CIM_Printer and just revise their descriptions to warn that
    authoritative info can be found in their sibling properties in
    CIM_PrintService.

    We could warn that 'current-xxx' properties were inherently ambiguous
    and therefore 'implementation-dependent'.

    That's sort of a diplomatic course that treats as editorial what we
    think were mistakes, without stepping on the toes of any previous
    implementors or CR submitters.

    Cheers,
    - Ira

    Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
    Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
    PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839
    phone: +1-906-494-2434
    email: imcdonald@sharplabs.com
    -----Original Message-----
    From: owner-wims@pwg.org [mailto:owner-wims@pwg.org]On Behalf Of
    Richard_Landau@Dell.com
    Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 1:20 PM
    To: wims@pwg.org
    Subject: WIMS> CIM> A few notes from today's concall with CIM Core WG

    The concall today went reasonably well, and we got much more than our
    allotted fifteen minutes of fame. Still didn't quite get thru it all, but
    close.
    Comments that I heard and noted during the discussion.
    - Adding properties to PrintService, no problem. Deprecating properties is
    harder. We may get pushback from some people who have already implemented
    them, like parts of IBM or HP.
    - Need to find out what the history of the changes was. It's their
    impression that all the changes were made on behalf of PWG by some champion
    in Core. John Crandall will get hold of Steve Jerman.
    - For some items such as consoles, covers, channels, maybe counters, it will
    likely be better to write a profile that describes how to use existing
    classes to model these items. Need to check on the availability of suitable
    existing classes.
    - Language interpreter might be modeled with SoftwareIdentity; not entirely
    clear.
    - For some items, we can probably use the Capabilities and Settings classes
    and mechanism already in CIM. [Might be reasonable for paper sizes, media
    paths, trays.]
    - We should take a look at the Profile User's Guide for guidance. [I'll try
    to find it.]
    Overall, the topic ended very abruptly and I felt left hanging. We need a
    working contact or two within Core who can do the education back and forth
    about CIM and Printers. We need to look at doing the editorial changes as
    "low hanging fruit first." We need to discuss process. They did not seem
    to disagree with the scope, but the next steps were not clear to me. Harry,
    Ira, et al., do you understand better how to proceed?
    rick
    -------------------------
    Richard_Landau(at)dell(dot)com, System Mgt Arch & Stds
    +1-512-728-9023, One Dell Way, RR5-3 Box 8352, Round Rock, TX 78682



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 30 2005 - 13:32:07 EDT