By the sounds of what I heard in the call, today (even though we didn't
get to closure), I think Ira is on the right track. I think the only
things we can reliably deliver in the Dec timeframe (for approval in Jan)
is the very low handing fruit. This should establish the relationship and
we can go forward from there.
----------------------------------------------
Harry Lewis
IBM STSM
Chairman - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
http://www.pwg.org
IBM Printing Systems
http://www.ibm.com/printers
303-924-5337
----------------------------------------------
"McDonald, Ira" <imcdonald@sharplabs.com>
Sent by: owner-wims@pwg.org
09/30/2005 11:33 AM
To
"'Richard_Landau@Dell.com'" <Richard_Landau@Dell.com>, wims@pwg.org
cc
Subject
RE: WIMS> CIM> A few notes from today's concall with CIM Core WG
Hi Rick,
I share your frustration that we were left hanging about CIM Core
working contacts and CR guidance.
I guess we try to write a 'low hanging fruit' CR (editorial only).
We could decide NOT to deprecate the misplaced 'default-xxx' properties
in CIM_Printer and just revise their descriptions to warn that
authoritative info can be found in their sibling properties in
CIM_PrintService.
We could warn that 'current-xxx' properties were inherently ambiguous
and therefore 'implementation-dependent'.
That's sort of a diplomatic course that treats as editorial what we
think were mistakes, without stepping on the toes of any previous
implementors or CR submitters.
Cheers,
- Ira
Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839
phone: +1-906-494-2434
email: imcdonald@sharplabs.com
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-wims@pwg.org [mailto:owner-wims@pwg.org]On Behalf Of
Richard_Landau@Dell.com
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 1:20 PM
To: wims@pwg.org
Subject: WIMS> CIM> A few notes from today's concall with CIM Core WG
The concall today went reasonably well, and we got much more than our
allotted fifteen minutes of fame. Still didn't quite get thru it all, but
close.
Comments that I heard and noted during the discussion.
- Adding properties to PrintService, no problem. Deprecating properties
is
harder. We may get pushback from some people who have already implemented
them, like parts of IBM or HP.
- Need to find out what the history of the changes was. It's their
impression that all the changes were made on behalf of PWG by some
champion
in Core. John Crandall will get hold of Steve Jerman.
- For some items such as consoles, covers, channels, maybe counters, it
will
likely be better to write a profile that describes how to use existing
classes to model these items. Need to check on the availability of
suitable
existing classes.
- Language interpreter might be modeled with SoftwareIdentity; not
entirely
clear.
- For some items, we can probably use the Capabilities and Settings
classes
and mechanism already in CIM. [Might be reasonable for paper sizes, media
paths, trays.]
- We should take a look at the Profile User's Guide for guidance. [I'll
try
to find it.]
Overall, the topic ended very abruptly and I felt left hanging. We need a
working contact or two within Core who can do the education back and forth
about CIM and Printers. We need to look at doing the editorial changes as
"low hanging fruit first." We need to discuss process. They did not seem
to disagree with the scope, but the next steps were not clear to me.
Harry,
Ira, et al., do you understand better how to proceed?
rick
-------------------------
Richard_Landau(at)dell(dot)com, System Mgt Arch & Stds
+1-512-728-9023, One Dell Way, RR5-3 Box 8352, Round Rock, TX 78682
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 30 2005 - 13:58:50 EDT