RE: WIMS> CIM - DMTF Conference -- initial report

From: McDonald, Ira (imcdonald@sharplabs.com)
Date: Wed Dec 07 2005 - 17:26:22 EST

  • Next message: McDonald, Ira: "WIMS> Rewrite of Enterprise Mgmt sequence into four figures"

    Hi Bill,
     
    Looks fine to me.
     
    Cheers,
    - Ira
     

    Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
    Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
    PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839
    phone: +1-906-494-2434
    email: imcdonald@sharplabs.com

    -----Original Message-----
    From: owner-wims@pwg.org [mailto:owner-wims@pwg.org]On Behalf Of
    wamwagner@comcast.net
    Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 4:56 PM
    To: Harry Lewis; wims@pwg.org
    Subject: WIMS> CIM - DMTF Conference -- initial report

     The following is derived from minutes and I beleive is our conclusion on
    the aoproach toaddress the existing DMTF/PWG work register. I ask that the
    members of the working group comment on whether this is indeed their
    understanding of the conclusions reached. Then, separately, we may consider
    if there is a need to reconsider this approach.
     
    Thanks.
    Bill Wagner, Chairman, WIMS WG/PWG
     

    Approach to Address DMTF/PWG CIM-PWG Alignment Work Register

     

    1. Identify and Categorize Proposed Updates and Corrections to Current
    CIM Printing Classes - Basically done for PRINTER in Ira's and Rick's
    documents

    2. Gain understanding of CIM Change Request (CR) form and process -
    done, to the extent feasible

    3. Review and if necessary supplement proposed changes in current
    documents to identify all applicable changes and to properly categorize
    according to:

    a. Purely editorial changes to improve descriptions and to key elements
    to proper source documents

    b. Minimal technical changes including minor updates to mapping, and
    perhaps addition of enums that are missing. No deprecation or addition of
    elements.

    c. Complete technical changes including, perhaps extensive deprecation
    and addition of elements

    4. Changes considered benign and non controversial (primarily from
    categories a & b) will be formed into a Change Request (CR) and submitted.
    The PWG WIM/CIM WG will deliver a single CR consisting of CIM editorials
    changes and minimal (low impact) technical changes to CIM classes and
    dependant properties. Because of the inter-relationship of printing classes,
    all nine printing related classes would be addressed.

    5. Changes will be compiled into a PWG informational specification
    including details of correct usage of elements in CIM.

     

    The need for and desirability of category 'c' changes and the addition of
    classes, such as for multifunction services, would be considered as a
    potential continuing activity after the successful completion of the CR
    activity.

     

    -------------- Original message --------------
    From: Harry Lewis <harryl@us.ibm.com>

    Bill, is there an excerpt from threads or minutes that concisely describes
    "the approach we have outlined"?
    ----------------------------------------------
    Harry Lewis
    IBM STSM
    Chairman - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
    http://www.pwg.org
    IBM Printing Systems
    http://www.ibm.com/printers
    303-924-5337
    ----------------------------------------------

    wamwagner@comcast.net

    12/06/2005 10:34 PM

    To
    Harry Lewis/Boulder/IBM@IBMUS, "Whittle, Craig" <cwhittle@sharplabs.com>

    cc
    "McDonald, Ira" <imcdonald@sharplabs.com>, "'lee.farrell@cda.canon.com'"
    <lee.farrell@cda.canon.com>, "Zehler, Peter" <Peter.Zehler@xeroxlabs.com>,
    Richard_Landau@Dell.com

    Subject
    Re: DMTF Conference -- initial report

                    

    I second the thanks Craig. It certainly all sounds very positive. I suggest
    that we continue with the approach we have outlined. Hopefully, the
    constructive support from DMTF will encourage more participation from PWG
    members.
      
    Bill Wagner
      
    -------------- Original message --------------

    Great job Craig!
    I've been trying to convey that they would likely want us to "take the ball
    and run" (in ANY direction!). You've confirmed this.
    We should look into the JDF link. I'll start by asking Claudia.
    Does anyone feel our plans are not well articulated by the "work product
    options list" we've been floating and a subset of Rick's pres! entation? If
    anyone wants to contribute a concise summary it will be welcome. Otherwise,
    I'll be drafting one on the plane Thursday morning.
    ----------------------------------------------
    Harry Lewis
    IBM STSM
    Chairman - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
    http://www.pwg.org
    IBM Printing Systems
    ! http://www.ibm.com/printers
    303-924-5337
    ----------------------------------------------

    "Whittle, Craig" <cwhittle@sharplabs.com>

    12/06/2005 09:14 PM

    To
    wamwagner@comcast.net, "McDonald, Ira" <imcdonald@sharplabs.com>, Harry
    Lewis/Boulder/IBM@IBMUS, "'lee.farrell@cda.canon.com'"
    <lee.farrell@cda.canon.com>, Richard_Landau@Dell.com, "Zehler, Peter"
    <Peter.Zehler@xeroxlabs.com>

    cc

    Subject
    DMTF Conference -- initial report

                    

    All:
     
    I was able to meet briefly with Winston Bumpus, John Crandall, and Steve
    Jerman today to pass on our concerns with PWG/DMTF CIM realignment activity.
    Here are some of the highlights:
    * Winston was very aware of our need to get help from DMTF
    community. In his introduction to DMTF class he mentioned the importance of
    alliances and mentioned the recent relationship established with the PWG.
    * John indicated tha! t the DMTF would sponsor a couple of
    teleconferences to address our concerns. When I suggested that the PWG c!
    ould sponsor the teleconference, he indicated that there would be others in
    the DMTF who would want to have input into our directions so a DMTF
    sponsored call would work better for them.
    * Steve Jerman does not remember much about the CR he submitted
    years ago. He was just the editor. He said that the changes may have come
    from JDF in support of job related elements. He was unaware of any
    implementations.
    * I also learned that deprecating objects is no big deal. John
    Crandall said they could always be "undepreciated" in the review cycle. &!
    nbsp; * :-)*** *** ********** ** ******** **** ********* *** *******
    ************ ********
    *
    I get the feeling they are expecting us to take "take the ball and run with
    it". I didn't share our plans beyond the editorial and "non-controversial"
    work products (I'll wait for Harry to share these plans). Let me know if
    you have any specific questions (and to whom) you would like for me to ask.
    *
    Best regards,
    *
    **CW
    *



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Dec 07 2005 - 17:24:04 EST