From: Hastings, Tom N (Tom.Hastings@xeroxlabs.com)
Date: Thu Jan 26 2006 - 18:13:17 EST
Hi Rick,
To answer you questions about IPP:
(Printer MIB has a good intro. Where is the similar overview for IPP?)
TH> The first two sections of RFC 2911 are a good intro to IPP.
Google of RFC 2911 gets: http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2911.html
Also the PWG Semantic Model (IEEE-ISTO 5105.1-2004) gives a good summary
of all of IPP semantics, including the many additional IETF and
IEEE-ISTO extensions standards to the base IPP RFC 2911.
Google of "PWG Semantic Model" gets: http://www.pwg.org/sm/
Tom
P.S. I never leave home without Google.
________________________________
From: owner-wims@pwg.org [mailto:owner-wims@pwg.org] On Behalf Of
Richard_Landau@Dell.com
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 09:41
To: wims@pwg.org
Cc: Winston_Bumpus@Dell.com
Subject: WIMS> CIM> Brief notes from conccall with CIM Core this morning
Short notes on a few things I heard in the CIM Core concall today. (I
didn't have much opportunity to take notes for the first half hour, but
here are some things I remember.)
Easy changes first: good idea. One, maybe two, CRs; maybe enums are
separate, since they're sizable and substantive.
Don't bother with white papers. Draft directly into CR format, then
edit as needed.
Don't bother with PWG private extensions. Propose phase 3 changes as
experimental. Then the implementation experience of two companies will
be needed to promote the changes to full status.
Do UML diagrams first for the new class structure, and get agreement on
the structure before writing a lot of text.
Core needs some overview of the printing model. (Printer MIB has a good
intro. Where is the similar overview for IPP?)
Use Capabilities and Settings classes (CIM_xxxx) to express such for
printers. The usual division is
- What is the device capable of? (r/o in Capabilities)
- What has the manager requested of the device? (r/w in Settings)
- What is the device actually doing? (properties in the device class
itself)
(These classes are not completely straightforward, as I recall. I will
look for some examples.)
Think about doing a profile in the long term. (A really good idea. I
will explain this and get an example for PWG to look at. I think we
should draft the profile along with the UML.)
For the major changes, be sure to include some consideration of
- related element causing error
- health and status
- messages
- indications (event notifications in CIM, related to traps, alerts,
alarms, etc.)
Send draft things, if we wish, to John Crandall and Jon_Hass@dell.com,
or to wg_cimcore@dmtf.org
Gotta go.
rick
-------------------------
Richard_Landau(at)dell(dot)com, System Mgt Arch & Stds
+1-512-728-9023, One Dell Way, RR5-3 Box 8509, Round Rock, TX 78682
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jan 26 2006 - 18:14:09 EST